This service is a SCAM! Proof

Investigation suggests this service is a scam. Read the verification section for detailed proof.
MoleSwap.xyz

MoleSwap.xyz

[SCAM] No logs and no KYC crypto swap service.

Scores

3
Overall
Very Bad
90
Privacy
Excellent
0
Trust
Terrible
lvl. 0/4
Guaranteed no KYC
Terms explicitly state KYC will never be requested.

Overall = 60% Privacy + 40% Trust (Truncated)

Learn about scores All attributes list

Terms of Service Review

Not available on scam services

moleswap.xyz

Events

View all

  1. Description update

    Description was updated

  2. Verification step added

    "CrowSwap, Zeroslip, and Moleswap Identified as Scam Operations" was added

  3. Verification update

    Verification status changed from COMMUNITY_CONTRIBUTED to VERIFICATION_FAILED

  4. Verification step added

    "Investigation 03" was added

  5. Verification step warning

    "Investigation 01" status changed from pending to warning

  6. Verification step warning

    "Investigation 02" status changed from failed to warning

  7. Verification step pending

    "Investigation 01" status changed from failed to pending

  8. Verification update

    Verification status changed from VERIFICATION_FAILED to COMMUNITY_CONTRIBUTED

  9. Verification step added

    "Investigation 02" was added

  10. Verification step added

    "Investigation 01" was added

  11. Attribute change

    An attribute was removed (details unavailable)

  12. Attribute change

    An attribute was removed (details unavailable)

  13. Verification update

    Verification status changed from COMMUNITY_CONTRIBUTED to VERIFICATION_FAILED

  14. Attribute added

    Attribute "Can't analyze ToS" was added to MoleSwap.xyz

Learn about events

Verification

Learn more
Scam

Confirmed as a SCAM or not what it claims to be.

Investigation suggests this service is a scam. Read the verification section for detailed proof.

Verification proof

We made an extensive investigation, with collaboration of some community members. Read it below.

Verification Steps

Comments

About comments

  • Comments are visible after approval.
  • Moderation is light.
  • Double-check before trusting.
4
4 ratings
5
75%
4
0%
3
0%
2
0%
1
25%

AI Summary

Updated

Moleswap receives praise for its instant swaps and great UX, with users appreciating the helpful team on Telegram and no-KYC policy. However, concerns exist about address reuse and social media growth, flagged as potential scam indicators by some, though no scam reports are confirmed. The service is in beta, with ongoing improvements and private testing.

  • Instant swaps
  • Great UX
  • Helpful team
  • Address reuse
  • Social media concerns
Login to comment
Newest Most Upvotes
Show unmoderated (1)
knotted_charm_2699
0 • 1/5
Funds blocked

i got scammed 100 XMR on crowswap, stay away from those exchanges.

eroding_offensive_9930
0 • 5/5

Just created an account on here to write a review for Moleswap. Perfect instant swapper and one of the best UX in the market IMO. Team is always helpful on TG. Sleeper.

steamed_paraphrase_2388
0 •

You mentioned two main red flags “address reuse and unnatural channel growth”. How do address reuse and “unnatural telegram channel growth” confirm something is a scam? We have completed 173 exchanges so far, and there have been ZERO reports of people being scammed. You, admin, have also successfully completed an exchange. Yet, reusing addresses is now considered a confirmed scam. I received my money but they’re reusing an address, scam! I understand that it can be difficult for people to admit their mistakes, so they may look for anything to support their claims, such as adding a new red flag citing our telegram member count as an argument for labeling us a scam. At this point you just want us labeled as a scam and there’s nothing i can say or do to change that outcome. Apparently no victim no crime doesn’t apply here. Guilty until proven innocent, very disappointing.

pluja
Admin
0 •

I have removed the SCAM label based on your feedback and the absence of user reports. However, I will maintain the failed verification steps for now, as I believe these remain legitimate concerns that warrant user awareness.

To clarify my process: I have no personal motivation to label services as scams. My primary responsibility is protecting kycnot.me users, which requires exercising caution when identifying patterns commonly associated with scam services. Based on my experience maintaining this directory, both address reuse for larger amounts and artificially inflated social media growth are red flags in the privacy services space, and more so if the two are spotted together.

The address reuse pattern is particularly concerning because it suggests different handling of high-value versus low-value transactions - a common selective scamming technique. While your service may have legitimate reasons for this behavior, it represents a deviation from standard security practices that users should be aware of.

Given that no scam reports have been filed and considering your response, I’m reclassifying the service as COMMUNITY_CONTRIBUTED while keeping the verification warnings visible. This allows users to make informed decisions while acknowledging that the service hasn’t been definitively proven fraudulent.

I remain open to removing these warnings if the underlying concerns can be adequately addressed.

steamed_paraphrase_2388
0 •

Address reuse is no long applicable since we’re now testing privately.

And the telegram comment is just ridiculous, now you’re just searching for reasons to keep us labeled as a scam.

steamed_paraphrase_2388
0 •

Message from Moleswapxyz team:

We’re still in beta and continuously improving our platform. We’re integrating a system that allows for the routing of transactions based on size and risk. Smaller and less risky transactions are routed through aggregated streams, while larger and riskier transactions are routed through our own pools and/or our partner’s pools (which also have strict no kyc/freezing protocols). To facilitate these transactions, we use a different system for routing. Addresses are refreshed based on usage, so the same address remains active as long as it isn’t used. Your claims of a hard-coded Segwit address are false, you’re just jumping the gun on labeling us a scam. There is not one person who has actually been scammed, only bad faith assumptions have been made. While it’s true that crypto is prone to scams and one should always be cautious, we should try to refrain from labeling everything as a scam. Especially since there’s not a single person claiming to be scammed while quite a few people can tell you they’re satisfied with our service.

pluja
Admin
0 •

Hi. The reuse of addresses is a pattern that we have seen in many exit scams, so it’s preferred to mark a service as scam and be proven otherwise when we see some scam-like patterns. That being said, I want to ask what happens in the event where two persons create a trade at the same time for the same amount, or even different amounts (a thing that could happen in high volume situations); how do you detect who paid what in this case?

steamed_paraphrase_2388
0 •

Absolutely understandable and i respect any effort trying to protect the community. To your question; This feature is still experimental and is still undergoing testing, We disabled this feature on the main site now and are testing in private. Once core functionality works flawlessly we will introduce unique addresses alongside other features before fully integrating into the exchange, however in your scenario we could refund both sender addresses based on txid.

self-help_cabbie_9791
0 • 5/5

Recommended by a friend and it works like a charm - I use it to swap between XMR and ETH. No KYC and no CeX games I am tired of.

steamed_paraphrase_2388
0 •

Thank you! Looking forward to serving you again!

imperialist_trap_8170
0 • 5/5

swap worked seamlessly. would use it again

steamed_paraphrase_2388
0 •

Thank you for using our service!