steamed_paraphrase_2388

You mentioned two main red flags "address reuse and unnatural channel growth". How do address reuse and "unnatural telegram channel growth" confirm something is a scam? We have completed 173 exchanges so far, and there have been ZERO reports of people being scammed. You, admin, have also successfully completed an exchange. Yet, reusing addresses is now considered a confirmed scam. I received my money but they're reusing an address, scam! I understand that it can be difficult for people to admit their mistakes, so they may look for anything to support their claims, such as adding a new red flag citing our telegram member count as an argument for labeling us a scam. At this point you just want us labeled as a scam and there's nothing i can say or do to change that outcome. Apparently no victim no crime doesn't apply here. Guilty until proven innocent, very disappointing.

Address reuse is no long applicable since we're now testing privately. And the telegram comment is just ridiculous, now you're just searching for reasons to keep us labeled as a scam.

Absolutely understandable and i respect any effort trying to protect the community. To your question; This feature is still experimental and is still undergoing testing, We disabled this feature on the main site now and are testing in private. Once core functionality works flawlessly we will introduce unique addresses alongside other features before fully integrating into the exchange, however in your scenario we could refund both sender addresses based on txid.

Thank you for using our service!

Thank you! Looking forward to serving you again!