decision-making_skyrocket_9680

Profile Information

Username

decision-making_skyrocket_9680
Display Name

Not set
Karma

1

Account Status

Account Type

Standard User
Spam Status
Not Flagged
Joined

Jun 7

Service Affiliations

No service affiliations yet.

Karma Unlocks

Earn karma to unlock features and privileges. Learn about karma

Positive unlocks

10% review weight*

above -5 karma

Unlocked

20% review weight*

5 karma

Locked

Vote on comments

20 karma

Locked

45% review weight*

25 karma

Locked

80% review weight*

150 karma

Locked

Display name

150 karma

Locked

Website link

175 karma

Locked

Profile picture

200 karma

Locked

High Karma badge

500 karma

Locked

* Reviews with approved usage proof get 90% weight. Verified reviews get 100%.

Negative unlocks

0% review weight*

-5 karma

Avoided

Negative Karma badge

-10 karma

Avoided

Untrusted badge

-30 karma

Avoided

Comments disabled

-50 karma

Avoided

Negative karma leads to restrictions. Keep interactions positive to avoid penalties.

Recent Comments

1 comments

Service	Comment	Status	Upvotes	Date
Skytelecom	I am the same user who posted as flexible_polarity_4636. My previous account was removed, but I am a real customer and can provide dashboard screenshots as proof. Based on my own testing, I noticed multiple indicators suggesting SkyTelecom relies on SIP24 infrastructure, including identical routing behavior, provisioning patterns, and service characteristics. There is nothing wrong with using upstream providers, but customers should be aware of it. My concern is transparency, not the use of upstream carriers. Users deserve to know how the service is actually delivered.	APPROVED	0	Jun 7

Recent Votes

Locked

Recent Suggestions

No suggestions yet.

Recent Karma Transactions

1 karma

Action	Description	Points	Date
Comment approved	Your comment #comment-3651 in Skytelecom has been approved!	+ 1	Jun 8